Best Innovation Measurement
What metrics do you use you measure the results of your innovation team? Do you count the number of new ideas they have collected? How about the number of new ideas they have generated or the number of new product introductions they have been responsible for?
These are very useful measures, but don’t always truly reflect anything of much use to justify the existence of an innovation team. In fact, there is only one thing which does that: a deep association with actual financial results. And the association needs to prove that innovation is a very special investment type, one that is better than anything else available.
This is true whether you are running a programme in the private sector, in which case you will be about bringing in new revenue, or the public sector, with a financial measure around cost savings.
The financial hurdle innovators need is to recoup the funds invested in them, and buy medications then make enough new money to demonstrate they are the best available investment opportunity available.
Consider the case where an organisation has the opportunity to invest in a Lean programme, which is project order antibiotics online ed to return at least 20% savings as bloated processes are thinned down and efficiencies are found. Or, it can invest in an innovation effort.
In this case, the innovators must develop returns of at least 20% if they want to keep their funding. Frankly, it is likely that the returns from a Lean initiative will be more certain – i.e., they are less risky – than innovation, since innovation projects usually fail up to 80% of the time. Therefore, to compete, the innovators have to do rather better than the baseline 20%.
Its fundamental capital pricing. The more risky your investments, the better the return needs to be to justify the investment in the first place.
Do you know what to do to measure your innovation program? James A Gardner has written a free online book with genuine guidance on innovation metrics.